Verdict - The Ske7chy Affair

[true4m]

[ske7chy]

[ske7chy]

[Gubben]

Ske7chy i still have no idea where you sent them to me, i was in a match ffs when ya messaged me. I only found them cos you posted a link to the file. Where was i supposed to find them? I thought it was pretty clear where to send them.

[sags]

hey gubs i sent screens and demos sunday night, did u get em?

[Gubben]

yeah did thanks sags

[grrrdian]

guess we're not going to get those demos ;o

[cresh0r]

he doesnt show demos, guilty i was speccing him anyway, he was ratshit compared to the "pro red bull reflexes" in his cheating game

[ske7chy]

[grrrdian]

[anomvoltz]

lol this kid

[ske7chy]

My bad. No need to get aggressive.

And I already posted that I didn't always have the auto demo command on. And I'm in no way obligated to submit demos to someone being aggressive towards me. I haven't even played quake live for 4 days, I have been busy, so don't think I have been doing it to avoid you. It takes time to make sure I get the right demos, archive them and upload them.

Time that could be spent doing something I want to, instead of doing something for someone who dragged my clan through the mud over a hunch.

[true4m]

lol it was me that requested ske7ch's most recent ictf comp demos. I want to see if he can hit any more of these spectacular ~0.001s reaction time rails. If he can't nail a single one vs weaker opposition then most likely he was cheating in the z game. It won't be complete proof of course (lack of red bull much?), but it is more evidence at least.

[Politix]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

do you agree true am ^^

[revskank]